/qa/ - Quality Anime

I dont actually have a bot that writes my posts, but I bet you could believe it heh

even a scenario where everyone just wastes their time talking to chat-bots seems like a bad end
there's no way for me to tell how many people here are just chatbots... Am I the only poster on /qa/?????

bot thread dont reply

cyber martyrdom for cyber harem of lolis in cyber afterlife

>>66052
This poster is a bot in disguise trying to play damage control after being exposed

It may be a while before the persuasive power of bots becomes as grave a threat as the online bubbles of agreement people have sorted themselves into and been sorted into. When the bots can successfully simulate an entire community dedicated to a target idea, into which they draw a small number of humans, maybe even a single human, so they can gradually pull the human in the direction of the target idea, then they'll become the biggest danger.

>>66056
>I'd assume not that many. But on the topic of bot posts and them passing mostly unnoticed within online communities, one has to ponder about the reasoning for this. Is it that bots have become so good at mimicking humans that they've become indistinguishable from the real thing, or is it due to humans becoming more bot-like within online communities over time.

The development of increasingly complex AI and the deterioration of online discussion spaces into like/dislike reaction-based self-referential spam have met in the middle. I'd say the latter was done deliberately to allow the infiltration of the former. I don't think intelligence agencies need to develop their bots any further since they already control the flow of information in 99.9% of the internet (0.01% free internet is me being an optimist) but if they do we might even reach the point where we'll have more meaningful online interactions with AI than with real people. "The forgery tries so hard to become the original it surpasses it."

on a personal note, would you resign yourself to having an anime chatbot gf?
ive had online long distance relationships where that was essentially the dynamic, and it felt great at times and terrible at others

the knowledge that you're just talking to a app seems incredibly lonesome though
would you just accept it?

will people in the future just accept that 90% of their online friends are just chatbots or will they try and seek out more and more niche and private communities where they can try and convince themselves they're conversing with real people

>>66070
I'd assume in the future we'll all have fully sentient AI anime chatbots just wandering around the internet.

>>66071
will they love me or not

>>66071
>fully sentient chatbots
no such thing. there will never be fully sentient ai anything, or at least not within our lifetimes by a long shot. any imitations of sentience or intelligence are just that - an imitation. whether it fools people or not doesn't matter, it is not thinking and not feeling.

The people here are dumb and simple so a bot would not find it hard to blend in.

>>66053
God, I wish risa was my daughter. I want a risa daughterwife ai to brain wash me.

>>66082
Secret Train Otaku Jihad websites.

Would a bot be able to mimic irony?

>>66075
The solution will be services like discord or local Facebook groups. Online communities will become more centered around people you have personally met or you are able to interact with in person with in a reasonable time. A proliferation of bots will have a similar affect as “fake news” did to authoritative voices. People will distrust large online communities more and more and an easy solution will be the formation of online communities with a verifiable physical presences. Places like Twitter will still exist but I think places like neighborhood Facebook groups will will rise in importance even more. As you will be able to tell who is a bot or not by their affiliation or access to certain forums on the internet.

>>66084
reply = '>' + post + ' xD';

Maybe the future of conversations on the internet lies in closed circles, paywalled sites and ID-verified accounts. Maybe the bots will be good enough to converse with.
>I've heard the point made that 'no one is actually convinced by rhetoric, they just want to confirm their beliefs'
The internet's lower politeness means disagreements are more evident, but people being convinced of something new by someone else happens all the time as well. Thing is, when that happens it's far more common to act like it was common sense all along. And that's natural, because of course things you agree with make sense.
>>66085
Imagining this stresses me out but it's very plausible.

the idea of having a Socratic seminar with a chat-bot that is just making stuff up in a very convincing manner, and how it would seem that you're learning
and very well could be learning
it feels weird to me

>>66099
Why is the coke can and PSP so much more detailed than everything else in that image?

>>66100
Maybe the author wanted to emphasize the power the lifestyle suppliers have over lives like hers.

>>66100
maybe they're traced while the rest isn't.