close windowKissu Info

Welcome to kissu.moe !

News

Want the legacy experience? Our original UI is on original.kissu.moe

Message of the Day

(^▽^) Yay!

/poll/ - Polling and Honesty

1699340254537295.png
+News

  1. Thread poll-3554

    1. B: /poll/R: 25
      Post 3554
      Watch Thread
      Anonymous
      No.3554
      1699340254...png
      - 1.78 MB
      (3108x1691)
    2. Post 3555
      Anonymous
      No.3555

      S should also be 20 or 25 cm smaller to be peak

    3. Post 3556
      Anonymous
      No.3556
      1697577859...png
      - 514.77 KB
      (1052x1072)

      3L

    4. Post 3557
      Anonymous
      No.3557

      LL out of pity

    5. Post 3558
      Anonymous
      No.3558

      M is the superior one

    6. Post 3559
      Anonymous
      No.3559

      >>3558
      20 years ago she would have been considered L. Yes she's perfect

    7. Post 3560
      Anonymous
      No.3560

      S probably has the best personality

    8. Post 3561
      Anonymous
      No.3561
      [MoyaiSubs...jpg
      - 416.15 KB
      (1920x1080)

      I wonder why LL is so comparatively unpopular. I guess you might as well go all the way and maximize the plump if that's your preference?

    9. Post 3562
      Anonymous
      No.3562

      >>3561
      Probably, it's just an in-between option that has no real stand out points of its own not emphasized better by 3L

    10. Post 3563
      Anonymous
      No.3563

      >>3561
      LL is like a moped. Fun to ride but you don't want your friends to see you doing it.

    11. Post 3564
      Anonymous
      No.3564

      >>3563
      >>3561
      I wanted to add. If there were a true choice between S and M I would have voted for it. I wonder how many others would have. It was the ideal body type promoted by the media before thick came into vogue.

      Basically M's top with S's bottom.

    12. Post 3565
      Anonymous
      No.3565

      Which one's the most ticklish?

    13. Post 3566
      Anonymous
      No.3566

      >>3564
      M's bottom with S's top
      >>3565
      I assume the fatter, the less sensitive

    14. Post 5071
      Anonymous
      No.5071

      More meat would normally be better, but LL has a better shape than 3L. The fact that her arms don't gain some level of fat is also strange looking.

    15. Post 5083
      Anonymous
      No.5083
      1708879849...jpg
      - 1004.66 KB
      (1776x2375)

      M is nice and lean but not entirely my taste. L is on the upper end of preference and I wouldn't want to go much further. Really it's not about the fat, it's about the distribution and overall proportions. Too much ass and thighs and she looks like Midna. Too much boobie and she's a cow. In between there's a healthy balance of pudge, breasts, and childbearing hips; squishy and huggable, but not corpulent.

    16. Post 5087
      Anonymous
      No.5087
      7a4ff08655...png
      - 2.30 MB
      (2958x2898)

      >>5083
      >corpulent
      i find this word quite funny because in other other languages it means "big-bodied", having a large corpus in general, but in english it took on the specific meaning of ffffFAT
      >Too much ass and thighs and she looks like Midna
      pic is s-tier though

    17. Post 5088
      Anonymous
      No.5088

      3L
      need slampig miku buhiiii

    18. Post 5089
      Anonymous
      No.5089
      __roon_azu...png
      - 5.69 MB
      (1889x3448)

      LL speaks to me

    19. Post 5091
      Anonymous
      No.5091

      hi roon

    20. Post 5092
      Anonymous
      No.5092

      should be multiple choice

    21. Post 5094
      Anonymous
      No.5094

      if there was a size between S and M, I'd pick that

    22. Post 5097
      Anonymous
      No.5097
      giwtwm.png
      - 1.20 MB
      (848x1899)

      >>5087
      Drumstick lolis are cute and have a mesugaki feel, but I like to think of her being just the right height to faceplant her boobs in a hug. A big soft hug you could really lean into would be blissful.

    23. Post 5098
      Anonymous
      No.5098
      1b3e11552f...jpg
      - 2.06 MB
      (2751x1590)

      >>5097
      >Drumstick lolis
      i'm gonna use that in the future
      oh about this
      >Really it's not about the fat, it's about the distribution and overall proportions.
      with this artist it's definitely about the fat, different levels of fat for the same person
      i, personally, prefer someone i can lift with my two hands and toss around, so i wouldn't go for anyone above the height of 160cm, especially not a fattie

    24. Post 5099
      Anonymous
      No.5099
      it talks.png
      - 622.67 KB
      (822x664)

      >>5098
      >with this artist it's definitely about the fat
      Yeah, I figured on that. I was more referring to a general case regardless of fetish; you can have a bunch of fat, but it just depends on where it's distributed as the same weight can vary from attractive and curvy — one could say voluptuous even — to "good god you're shaped like a pear". Small girls have their charm, you can pick them up whenever and they're easy to handle: the 40 kg Megumin meme comes to mind. But back to the proportion thing, if they're heavy then they should be tall. I post Ran a lot and I like to imagine she's got a good 15-25 kg in tails alone depending on fur and muscle density (really depends on how you headcanon if their strength is represented in part by actual muscle or all handwaved by magic), combine with height around a 190 cm ballpark and she's pretty heavy. I could manage to princess carry her, but tossing or swinging around is out of the question, that'll probably throw my back out.

    25. Post 5101
      Anonymous
      No.5101

      >>5098
      gross realistic fat

    26. Post 5102
      Anonymous
      No.5102
      __enoshima...jpg
      - 229.69 KB
      (1245x1981)

      >>5091
      hello

Top
New Reply
  1. D
  2. -
  3. B
  4. I
  5. H
  6. *
  7. U
  8. C
  9. J
  10. L
  11. G
  12. P
  13. A
Create a drawing S Turn Preview On
New Reply